helpmeinvestigate
Blog for Help Me Investigate, a project to make it easier for journalists, bloggers, and anyone else to collaborate on investigating questions of public interest.
In addition to this blog there are sub-sites on health, welfare and education, and open source tools (code available on GitHub and there's a Wordpress plugin here too). For more on the project, see this 'About' page.
Search
Tags
- video (27)
- foi (20)
- freedom of information (8)
- data (6)
- health (6)
- hmi (6)
- education (5)
- welfare (5)
- adrian goldberg (4)
- Iain Overton (3)
- View all 244 tags
- bribery (3)
- help me investigate (3)
- planning (3)
- roundup (3)
- EIR (2)
- Heather Brooke (2)
- about (2)
- audit commission act (2)
- bbc (2)
- birmingham city council (2)
- car (2)
- climatecamp (2)
- computer assisted reporting (2)
- contacts (2)
- data protection (2)
- david higgerson (2)
- election expenses (2)
- exemptions (2)
- expenses (2)
- gijc2011 (2)
- googledocs (2)
- guardian (2)
- hminetworks (2)
- howto (2)
- jon walker (2)
- local government (2)
- mark lee hunter (2)
- open data (2)
- open source (2)
- organisation (2)
- people (2)
- public interest (2)
- scraperwiki (2)
- sheilacoronel (2)
- sources (2)
- transparency (2)
- website (2)
- whatdotheyknow (2)
- wobbing (2)
- 30-year-rule (1)
- 5 live investigates (1)
- Academicfoi (1)
- Anthony Barnett (1)
- Buckingham Palace (1)
- CIJ (1)
- Daily Mail (1)
- David Donald (1)
- Denmark (1)
- Department for Communities and Local Government (1)
- Dr Rita Pal (1)
- EU (1)
- FOI Man (1)
- GP (1)
- Goldacre (1)
- HMIN (1)
- Hacks/Hackers (1)
- HelenaBengtsson (1)
- ICO (1)
- Maha Rafi Atal (1)
- MySQL (1)
- NHS (1)
- PGP (1)
- Paul Lewis (1)
- Prince Charles (1)
- Prince William (1)
- Public Business (1)
- SQL (1)
- Sandringham estate (1)
- Section 8 (1)
- Southwark Council (1)
- TFL (1)
- The Telegraph (1)
- Vexatious requests (1)
- Wikipedia (1)
- academies (1)
- accountability (1)
- accounts (1)
- annie machon (1)
- asktheEU (1)
- averages (1)
- ben harrow (1)
- bill morgan (1)
- birmingham university (1)
- bo elkjaer (1)
- boards (1)
- brigitte alfter (1)
- business journalism (1)
- buzzdata (1)
- cardiff (1)
- case studies (1)
Archive
Subscribe
You're a contributor here (Edit)
This is your Space (Edit)
Follow by email »
Get the latest updates in your email box automatically.
Subscribe via RSS
Get the latest updates in your email box automatically.
Ben Harrow
Natalie Eccleshall
Robert Dale
Kellie Maddox
Andrew Mackenzie
Chie Elliott
Teodora Beleaga
Chris Dodd
Paul Bradshaw
Paul Bradshaw
Paul Bradshaw
January 12th, 6:06pm
1 comment
Why the Freedom of Information Act makes GPs vulnerable under the new NHS
Posted by
Chie Elliott
by Chie Elliott
The National Health Service is about to undergo a major overhaul, with strategic health authorities and primary care trusts being abolished and GPs gaining control of the NHS budget and responsibility to commission healthcare services.
Some GPs are not happy about the pressure imposed by their additional administrative duties, which could detract from their primary role as doctors. Others may see the change as empowering, but more power probably also means increased public scrutiny – for doctors are not immune to the spying eye of Freedom of Information Act.
The resolution of case reference FS50295954 of the Information Commissioner's Office involving a general practice in County Durham illustrates the point.
The case was referred to the Information Commissioner, when the complainant failed to obtain full disclosure of the information he had requested to the practice. The ICO ruled in favour of the complainant.
What happened?
1. The complainant wrote an FOI letter to Weardale Practice requesting information on eight points mainly relating to the Practice's Health and Safety regulations.
2. Some of the information was released after the Information Commissioner intervened but some remained undisclosed.
3. The Practice tried to justify withholding information by using section 40 (2) of the Freedom of the Information Act, which refers to exemption on the grounds of personal data protection.
4. The Commissioner did not think disclosure of the information requested would cause damage or distress to the individuals whose data would be made public through it.
5. The ICO considered that Weardale Practice was in breach of the Freedom of Information Act.
You can read the Decision Notice in its entirety here.
The law is clear on doctors' accountabilities. Schedule 1 of the Freedom of Information Act covers which public authorities the Act covers. Part III of Schedule 1 relates to organisations and individuals in the National Health Service, with paragraphs 44 and 45 referring specifically to GPs and other medics:
"44. Any person providing general medical services, general dental services, general ophtalmic services or pharmaceutical services under Part II of the National Health Service Act 1977, in respect of information relating to the provision of those services
45. Any person providing personal medical services or personal dental services under arrangements made under section 28C of the National Health Service Act 1977, in respect of information relating ot the provision of those services."
Under the Freedom of Information Act, not only a practice but individual doctors working at the practice are considered to be public authorities and can therefore be held accountable.
Nothing new there. The novelty could be in the fact that we may be evaluating our GPs less as healers of our ailments, more as politicians in charge of public affairs that impact our welfare.
As long as the Freedom of Information Act rules, it is the patients who will have their fingers on the doctor's pulse.
Comments (1)
I'm sure they will be able to cope with the increased public scrutiny - fewer and fewer people now regard doctors as professionals, and instead often view them simply as a service to the public.
I would be interested to see if the FOI act and BMC rules on patient confidentiality clash, however.
Great post by the way.
Leave a comment...